The Journal applies a double-blind peer review system. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent reviewers, selected based on their scientific competence, who complete an evaluation form.

The evaluation criteria include:

• originality and scientific contribution;
• methodological rigor;
• clarity and coherence of argumentation;
• compliance with academic and ethical norms.

The evaluation process is conducted in a confidential manner. Editorial decisions are based exclusively on scientific merit and the recommendations of the reviewers.